Conference, journal, book series, and book chapter onboarding from one request flow.
Do you want to apply for an editorial program such as a conference, journal, book series, or book chapter?
Present your public identity, review readiness, organizer accountability, and operating timeline through one structured request before NIBVEDA provisions the live editorial workspace.
Author, reviewer, track chair, chair, organizer admin, and platform admin workspaces.
Application, submission, review, decisions, final files, registration, and communication governance.
A structured editorial environment instead of scattered manual coordination.
Choose the academic or professional publishing format that matches your program.
EMT supports different editorial models from one governed platform while preserving the language, proof requirements, and workflow expectations of each program type.
Best for track-based call-for-papers programs, committee visibility, reviewer assignment, revision rounds, and presentation-linked registrations.
Best for issue-driven or rolling scholarly workflows that need structured peer review, controlled decisions, revision tracking, and formal editorial correspondence.
Best for recurring edited volumes or thematic publication programs where multiple submissions move through curated review, screening, and release planning.
Best for a focused edited-book call where each chapter needs controlled intake, reviewer coordination, chapter-level decisions, and final manuscript collection.
Prepare the correct public proof and understand what the platform reviews.
The platform review becomes faster and cleaner when the supporting proof already matches the program format, the organizer identity, and the expected editorial operating model.
A verified public website is compulsory. The website should clearly show the program title, acronym, organizer identity, scope, and key dates. CFP upload is optional, but it still helps accelerate review.
The official CFP PDF is compulsory. The CFP should clearly show the organizer identity or applicant email context. A public website link remains optional when the CFP already serves as the primary public proof.
Verified applicant email, coherent organizer profile, and a trustworthy institutional presentation.
The submitted website or CFP must clearly align with the program title, acronym, dates, and organizer identity.
Submission start date, program start date, and program end date should reflect a realistic and manageable editorial schedule.
The request should be suitable for structured intake, peer review, decisions, registrations, final submission handling, and governed communication.
One approved program unlocks coordinated workspaces across the full publication chain.
After approval, the same dataset continues into connected role-based workspaces so every participant operates inside one governed editorial environment.
For manuscript submission, revisions, final files, registration completion, communication visibility, and participation tracking.
For assignment acceptance, review submission, recommendation capture, and structured assessment against the configured review form.
For track-scoped reviewer assignment, manuscript monitoring, and localized review operations within assigned tracks.
For end-to-end editorial control including reviewer settings, decision pipelines, email templates, access rules, and publication operations.
For program setup, event-page content, chair assignment, submission and file controls, backups, and operational readiness.
For application review, provisioning, governance, global users, template control, mail operations, backups, and audit visibility.
From application to live operations, EMT keeps the publication cycle connected.
The platform is designed to improve public credibility, communication clarity, and editorial control without fragmenting the workflow across disconnected tools.
Approved programs receive a clean public route such as /ICSDS-2027, making discovery, branding, and communication more credible.
Email templates, inbox and outbox tracking, platform mail flow, and chair communication controls keep publication communication professional and auditable.
Exports, reports, backups, and archival operations are already part of the operating model, helping institutions run disciplined publication cycles.
How your request moves from first verification to live editorial operations.
The onboarding flow is designed to reduce ambiguity at the start and create a smooth handover into the live workspaces after approval.
Unlock the application only after the applicant email has been verified through a secure confirmation link.
Provide organizer identity, program title, acronym, dates, expected volume, and the required public proof.
NIBVEDA validates the request for authenticity, consistency, publication readiness, and suitability for EMT workflow operations.
Approved programs are provisioned with public identity, role-based access structure, and the initial operating environment.
Authors, reviewers, chairs, organizer admins, and platform governance continue from one connected system with traceable workflow history.